The following video illustrates the fact that uninformed liberals know nothing of which they speak. They take to the streets, attend Cindy Sheehan rallies and protest for the sake of protesting. They bitch and complain about the war in Iraq, call Bush a terrorist and call for the destruction of Israel, yet have no freakin idea of the atrocities that Saddam committed when he was in power, or how many millions of men, women and children were murdered at his hands. At one point in the video, a dumb liberal was asked if she know who the Kurds were and she said no, obviously. She didn’t know that Saddam also fired Scud missiles into Israel targeting civilians during the first Gulf War. It’s a shame that these people are so uninformed, and at the same time, it is a blessing to live in a country where you can assemble for any reason, no matter how insane it may be.
peace…oh, and long live Israel.
Technorati Tags: liberal, liberalism, conservative, cindy sheehan, sheehan, anti war protest
yes please go away!
Do they really have talk radio?
inane...flat out insane!
once again...you are fuckin idiot!! you think this really represents liberalism just becasue some stupid college chick doesn't know shit?
You neo nazis never cease to amaze me with the rhetoric you spit! I spit on you, your readers and this lame blog.
another example of a pitiful conservative blog. obviously, the writer is some hick from Alabama!! lol.
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Next time ask that college kid on whether or not she thinks Che is some kinda hero. That would be good to see that response.
This was seriously an unbelievable. THanks for the laugh, and have a good night.
latina republican??? never knew that!!!
liberal and proud - once again, you liberal scum have to resort to name calling because you are so overwhelmed with emotion..but that's okay because I do it as well, and enjoy it too. At least have the decency to refute what I have to say with a reasonable argument. You just make yourself look quite stupid.
Ben – no not from Alabama, never even been there – you shmuck. If my blog is so pitiful, then why do you come here and read what I have to say? Oh, I get it…there are no decent liberal blogs for you to read so you come here and try and wreak havoc (kinda like there are no decent liberal talk radio programs as well).
I love it when you liberal infidels come try and battle me. Bring it on!
Oh, and listen up you uninformed piece of scum…I am latino and I am probably the most conservative person you will ever meet…open your eyes and realize that not all conservatives (or republicans) are white, upper class males…just like not all liberals are uninformed pieces of scum, except you of course.
Oh, and your web site sucks.
Typical liberal lunacy. College campuses produce brainless zombies, who cannot think for themselves. Luckily, I took precautions with my niece who is a student at Cal State LA. We've had long talks about liberal indoctrination by professors and student groups aimed at young impressionable kids. She thought I was joking, however, she now admits, I was correct. Because she is Hispanic, she is endlessly approached by La Raza MECHa types. Further, she is constantly asked to join socialist/communist and 'Blame America First' groups on campus, etc... Thank goodness I prepared her well and she rejects their lame tired old ideas.
I agree with Latina Republican with regards to Che. He was a murderous maniac. It's too bad kids today romanticize a figure who was a brutal killer and was respnosible for so many deaths. I own my own Che t-shirts which read, 'Che is dead, get over it' and 'Commie Bastard.' I get a kick out of the stares I recieve from my latino friends!
Those liberal idiots never fail to make me laugh!
I agree with SoCalGal. I'm glad that there are people like you who don't want our youth to be join the nut bandwagon- and is doing something about it by teaching your niece!
"At one point in the video, a dumb liberal was asked if she know who the Kurds were and she said no"
This does not occur in the video clip you have posted so I dont understand why you falsely represent what the girl says. Possibily you were blinded (deafened seems a more appropriate word almost!) by your own bias or otherwise I presume it is to lower the standing of your target in the eyes of your audience...... thats a defamation case there! lol
For me the most important aspect of the video clip is the disgust with which the person behind the camera states that the UN condemned the bombing, carried out by Isrea, of a potential nuclear facility in Iraq. Perhaps he should review the reasons for the condemnation........ it would certainly cast light on the possible illegality of the war in Iraq currently underway.
sean - my bad. there were two videos I was thinking about adding and I got them mixed up. Nonetheless, the person(s) in that video don't have a clue as to why they are even there or what they are protesting.
You should know by know that I make a living on defaming....lol. It's all in fun though.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
LOL - but how would they be educated...I mean we would need some huge force like, say, the media to educate people on things like the Kurds, or the Holocaust. If only we had such a vehicle.....
absolute lunacy!! great post!
How many millions? Please give me an exact number and your sources for the body count. How many millions did Saddam kill?
Oh, and while you're at it, could you tell me when American foreign policy became based on invading and occupying countries led by bad guys--and nothing else? And then after that could you remind me what Saddam had to do with September 11?
And once you've completed this assignment (preferably with better grammar than you've displayed in your blog thus far), could you remind me once again who, exactly, is uninformed?
bigdiggy...of course you have to resort to personal attacks (oh, bad grammar - big freakin deal). Go find the sources yourself...I get most of mine from Wikipedia. If you need tutoring on how to do research, I charge $100 an hour.
And, tell me where on my blog, Bid Diggy, where I said Saddam had something to do with 9/11. Seems to me like you are either confused or have some personal issues that you have to deal with.
Pointing out your dubious grammar is not a personal attack. It's an observation. And if you're going to be a blogger (which means some form of a writer), you ought not to give the appearance of ignorance through grammatical errors. It's as simple as that.
Next, you should consider doing "research" in sources other than Wikipedia. You should pay me $200 to copyedit your blog and to teach you how to do real research--or perhaps read a newspaper or any government document that would show you that he did not kill millions of people, and in any case that was not the original justification for invading Iraq. So, please answer my question: how many millions, exactly, did Saddam kill?
And then tell me, as I asked so nicely, to explain why we invaded Iraq and took out an admittedly bad man (though, as you know, you can find those in every corner of the word, and I don't see us invading and occupying their countries). And why haven't we defeated--or even located?--the people who actually attacked us on September 11?
You might guess that all of these questions lead me back to my original intention, which was to ask who is uninformed. Seems to me that it's you.
haha..nice one. Okay, maybe I'll cite ABC, CBS and NBC or better yet the New York Times. Would that make you feel better, Diggy?
The fact of the matter is that no one really knows how many people Saddam killed; whether it's thousands or millions really make no difference. He was a threat to our national security as is Ahmadinejad, Kim Jong, etc. and he needed to get dealt with just as the other two clowns that need to get dealt with (although I am sure Israel will take care of one).
I really don't care about the reasons Bush gave to go into Iraq. The fact is we are safer here in the US than we were during the rise of terrorism against the US and our interests, yah know, during the Clinton administration.
Let’s see if I am right (no pun)…
1993 World Trade Center bombing - killed six and injured 1,000, and your boy Clinton promised that the terrorists responsible would be hunted down and dealt with.
1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia - killed five soldiers and your boy Clinton promised that the terrorists responsible would be hunted down and dealt with.
1996 al-Khobar towers bombing in Saudi Arabia - killed 19 and injured 200 soldiers, and your boy Clinton promised that the terrorists responsible would be hunted down and dealt with.
1998 bombing of US embassies in Africa - killed 257 and injured 5,000, and your boy Clinton promised that the terrorists responsible would be hunted down and dealt with.
2000 bombing of the USS Cole - killed 17 and injured 3 sailors, and your boy Clinton promised that the terrorists responsible would be hunted down and dealt with.
And the Bush Administration…
2001 World Trade Center bombing (all planned during the Clinton Administration) – killed 3,000 + innocent folks, and what did Bush do…dealt with terrorism and he is continuing to do so, despite what the mainstream media says public opinion is.
The fact of the matter is, whether you hate Bush or not, he was not afraid to confront evil…something Clinton didn’t have the balls to do. Now, I am no Bush apologist because frankly, he is soft on border security and illegal immigration, something I am extremely upset about.
You see Diggy, I hate war just like you do. It breaks my heart to see women, children and innocent people dying in Iraq. But let me tell you something. I was in Somalia in 1993 and I remember as clear as day seeing 12 year old muslim boys walking the streets holding AK47s waiting to take lives. You have no idea what it is like outside your cozy little house in the suburbs do you? All the crap that we take for granted is not reality my friend. I don’t want to live like our friends in Israel do; having to worry about suicide bombers killing innocent people. I have two girls that I love with all my heart and if going to Iraq or wherever else on the globe to combat those terrorist bastards is going to make us secure here at home, I am all for it.
oh, and $200 an hour for copy editing services is too high. I can get someone much cheaper on craigslist.
And....mass graves are still being unearthed as we speak so whatever the true number really is continues to grow. Some are from recent months, but many have been found from an estimated 10-20 years ago (source: my brain...I heard this on the news a few months back...probably Fox!)
lol
If you want to talk about why we are in Iraq, you can point to the U.N. I believe that when Colin Powell approached them about a united UN force going into Iraq, the count on UN Resolutions for Iraq demonstating that they had disposed of their WMD's was up to 17. They had willfully failed to comply with SEVENTEEN (17) requests from the U.N. The US said that something needed to be done and the UN decided not to work with us, largely because of the corruption that has since been exposed. Three of the veto power nations, Germany, France and Russia vetoed the vote and, since that time, I am certain that France and Germany (at least their then representatives in the UN) have both been implicated in the Oil for Food Scandal. The problem is that the UN has been proven to be IMPOTENT. People ask why the US has been come the world's police force. I dislike it as much as any American, but the UN isn't doing it's job. It has become a corrupt and impotent institution and I think the US should pull out and/or pull it's funding. That's a lot of ca$h that could be put towards... education... border security... funding the troops... take your pick!
Oh... and I just had to add that one of the problems with the War on Terror is that, as it was through the 90's and previous, there was no front on which to fight our enemy. The battle in Iraq has given us a front to fight the TERRORISTS on. If you doubt that we are fighting terrorists in Iraq (some like to call them "freedom fighters"--HA!), just check out the 60 minutes interview with a former British terrorist who was told that he would be sent to fight in Iraq to be "reprogrammed" when he started asking too many questions. It was a safe haven for terrorists before we engaged them there, so lets take 'em out on their terms. No problem, it gives us a battle front.
As I'm not from America (shock horror), many of the above comments seem incredibly Amero-centric (I made up a word, you should be able to understand it). A great many of the above comments note the belief, whether right or wrong, that the American-led invasion of Iraq led to greater safety for Americans, yet fails to take into account other nations.
I am aware that in my country (which also invaded Afghanistan and Iraq), research shows that the risk of a terrorist incident has increased significantly since we went to war. I have been led to believe that independent research done in the US also conforms to this view.
Perhaps Urban Conservative, you should remonstrate on the fact that if these mass graves were indeed dug 10-20 years ago, why was it that the US sponsered Saddam Hussein during this time.
Jamie Lee, just to let you know, normally in logical discourse, resort to specific anecdote is not permitted as it serves only to inflame emotion and distort the truth.
James - thanks for stopping by the blog. Of course, you will find bias towards America in this blog. I am American and I am extremely proud to live in this great country.
You do bring up a great point but which country specifically are referring to?
And please do share the research/source that shows the rish of more terrorist activity.
There is another video akin to this one, the guy with the camera asks some different girls questions about Sunni vs Shia,etc. Urban, I saw the video about a year ago and have been trying to find it ever since. The ignorance of these girls that are protesting is mind-blowing. I also don't understand why they protest the recruiters, like they have any input on our foreign policy. These recruiters are just doing a job, most have wives and children, which is why they prefer being a recruiter. I really hope you can find.
I know no one's posted here in a while, and I'm pretty sure no one's responding to my insights anyway, but I just had to say something about UC's ignorance in his post here.
Do YOU know the story behind Saddam? Did you know we put him into power, and that initial descriptions of Saddam, by the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, called him a presentable, young, well-rounded leader? Did you know that we funded his war against Iran because we hated Iran more than anything, so Iraq, as the enemy of our enemy, fit the bill? Did you know we encouraged Saddam to invade Kuwait? There's a lot I'm sure you don't know. Saddam (rightfully) accused Kuwait of drilling into his land and stealing his oil. He wanted the problem taken care of, and the United States told him to do whatever he had to do, but do it quickly. Now what the hell would you interpret that to mean? Diplomacy isn't fast, so what's left to solve the conflict quickly? Well, Saddam, who had, by the way, the 4th largest military in the world at that time, thought logically and invaded Kuwait, because the United States told him multiple times to do so, not including the numerous times that GHW Bush said we have "no ties or obligations to Kuwait." Then what? We defend Kuwait. And we WIPE OUT the 4th largest military in the world in a matter of days. Saddam was scared out of his mind that he'd be killed, and he didn't understand (nor did his people understand) why the Americans were doing this (don't tell anyone, but it was because we were scared he might continue to invade Saudi Arabia, and that place's got our oil).
We sign a ceasefire, Saddam sighs relief because he didn't die, and President Bush ADMITS that he does NOT feel like we achieved total victory, since Saddam was still in power and there was no definite end to the fighting. But Saddam, while still technically in power, has no more military--we crushed it. So we encourage the Shia dominated south to rise against Saddam. They do, and revolution ensues. But Saddam asks us--he ASKS FOR OUR PERMISSION--to use helicopters against the rebels. We say, sure what the hell, you have no military, what can you do! Well, he crushes the rebels, as any national leader would do (as the United States has done whenever it encountered a rebellion). So now, we have Saddam and the Sunnis mad at us for destroying them when we said we wouldn't, and we have the Shias mad at us for allowing their enemy to kill them when we encouraged the Shias to rebel. Iraq is pissed at us, and they remain pissed at us, even when we come back in in 2004 and take out the villainous Saddam Hussein. They do not greet us a liberators, which is completely understandable, yet ignorant Americans did not understand why. And now we all hate anyone from the Middle East because Iraq didn't lie down and let us do as we wanted with them.
Did you know Bill Clinton wanted to invade Iraq too? But top White House officials said that the public would never go for it without a cataclysmic event to motivate them. Bill Clinton didn't get that event. GW Bush did. And, in an event COMPLETELY unrelated to Iraq, he and his puppeteers used that as a spring board to rally the American public to war against the Iraqis (did you know that no more than an hour after the two planes hit the Trade Buildings were our representatives in the White House asking "how can we tie this to Iraq?")
Iraq is an unjust war. It is our first example of the new diplomacy we are trying, that we tried under both GHW Bush and Clinton but failed. Any country's government we don't like, according to this new diplomacy, we have the legal and moral right to go in and take it out and replace it with our own sympathetic government. That's why people are complaining about the war.
Furthermore, it doesn't matter if those protesters know nothing about the Kurds because the Kurds have nothing to do with Iraq. Iran gassed the Kurds, not Saddam's Iraq. Not many people know that. Now you know.
†