Voter’s Survival Kit: Ten Things You Need to Know about Health Care

October 27th, 2008 Billy Hallowell

By Scott Bittle on October 23, 2008

Too often, trying to follow the presidential campaign debate is like coming in on the middle of a movie. You can get the gist of what’s going on, maybe, but you know that major plot points slipped past you – you know you could figure out who the murderer is, if you’d just been able to catch the first 15 minutes.

The basic reason is that the candidates, even when they talk about the issues, assume you already know the basics. The candidates figure they don’t have time to explain the background to you, and they figure it might bore you anyway, so they jump right into what their plan would do. That’s particularly unfair because the politicians themselves often are working off cheat sheets or talking points that give them the key points to make. Their staff has done the digging; the politician gets the bullet-point version.

Take health care, for example. The plans put forth by Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain are miles apart in ideological terms, and wickedly complicated in their details. But do the campaigns or the media spend much time stepping back and looking at what’s going on with the health care system, or why it needs fixing in the first place? Not really.

So here’s ten things you need to know about the state of the U.S. health care system. This is where we stand as a nation on this issue, and with these key facts in hand you can start to get your mind around the very complicated options the presidential candidates are putting out there. For a start:

Some 47 million Americans, 15.8% of the population, don’t have health insurance.

These are mainly people in jobs that don’t offer benefits: people between jobs, part-timers, the self-employed and lots of folks who work for small businesses. The number of uninsured may well go up over the next year because of the bad economy, as businesses lay off workers or cut back benefits.

The U.S. government spends nearly $700 billion each year on health care, mainly for Medicare (which covers nearly all older Americans), Medicaid (which helps cover those who are very poor) and care for veterans.

Meanwhile private health costs amount to about $1.1 trillion every year. About six in ten Americans get health insurance from their employer.

And just in case you hadn’t noticed, individuals shell out for health care too. It’s usually for deductibles, co-pays, premiums and drugs that aren’t covered by insurance. For an unfortunate group of Americans, it’s what they have to pay when they have a very serious illness or injury and their insurance basically runs out.

The U.S. health care system is incredibly complicated. Essentially, it’s not a ‘system’ at all – it’s a patchwork of private insurance and government programs like Medicare. There are holes in the system – and there’s duplication as well.

Health care costs have been rising faster than inflation for decades (they went up 6.7 percent in 2006). This will probably get worse. Government experts project health spending could double in 10 years

This presents a huge burden for business and it’s a budget-buster for the government, but frankly you’ll be on the line too. Business faced with spiraling health care costs sometimes cut benefits or raises or may even cut back their work force. Government needs to get the money from someone to cover health care costs. Guess who?

Most experts say expensive new treatments, procedures and drugs, along with an aging population are the major reason health care costs are shooting upward, but everyone also agrees that there’s a lot of inefficiency in the system too.

The plans of both presidential candidates are going to cost a lot of money. And given the staggering projections for the federal deficit over the next few years, money is going to be tight. So the government’s going to have to find a way to pay any reform plan.

How do we know this? Here are our sources:

Census Bureau, Health Insurance 2006; Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Health Expenditures Data; Government Accountability Office, The Nation’s Long-Term Fiscal Outlook April 2008; Kaiser Family Foundation, Trends and Indicators in the Changing Health Care Marketplace; Tax Policy Center, Analysis of the Presidential Candidates’ Tax Plans,

Want to think over the options for actually fixing this problem? Have a look at Public Agenda’s Voter Survival Kit on health care, Your Money or Your Life, where we lay out different options, with potential costs and tradeoffs. And to check out the candidate plans in detail, visit the McCain and Obama web sites.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,


Rating: 2.5/5 (34 votes cast)

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please subscribe to my blog!
  • JackieM
    FreeperWatch--free market principals will definitely work in healthcare as long as the playing field is leveled so law need to be in place to ensure this happens.
  • Bravo Billy Hallowell!


    I'm a bit late coming in on this thread but I've long been trying to find plain facts presented in a conservative forum (I think I'll do some more reading here at urbanconservative!).


    What this debate really needs is rational discuss about the merits of various ideas.  And your post simply outlining the basic facts is an essential first step.


    My own view on this matter is that the model of free markets and competition just doesn't work in some industries – Health being one of them.
  • JackieM
    obama won't take the time to do this even though it is an excellent idea.  however, i think everyone should pay something for their care.  obama is trying to rush the billl through and wants the bill created behind closed doors so that no one will be able to challenge it.  it is democracy and transparency at its best-not!  obama does a half-assed job on everything he touches.  we can see this through the "stimulus," budget and credit card bills.  however, the damn liberals will buy into anything he is selling so it doesn't matter.
  • Norb Leahy
    The decision to require medical treatment anywhere for anybody is what should be challenged.  What happened to public health facilities the uninsured could go to ?   These facilities were once staffed by volunteers.  My grandfather was an M.D.  He had a regular practice in St. Louis, Mo. Monday through Friday.  Every Saturday he traveled to Prairie du Rocher Illinios to treat his charity patients there.  These poor farmers would pay him with bushels of produce in payment for his house calls and medicine.  He practiced from 1904 to 1962 and died at age 79.  Back then, hospitals were owned by churches and religious orders, who received donations from wills and wealthy doners.  During the 1970s, these hospitals were sold to for profit healthcare companies.  That was the end of affordable healthcare.  Today Dentists continue to treat charity patients.  They charge them a much reduced rate and take payments over time.  Requiring the uninsured to pay into our current healthcare scheme would be the act of a police state.
  • Brian
    http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/feeds.r...

    Check out this link where Rep. Paul Ryan presents the GOP health care plan. What do you think?
  • Titus Hunt
    David:  i understand you are frustrated and so am i.  however, i have to vote for the plan that will work.  You can't build from the bottom up for several reasons. 

    1.  everyone does not have the same agenda.  a lot of healthy able-bodied folks do not want to work and will not try to gain any skills so they will always want handouts.  we/the working folks do not have an infinite amount of money and what little we have should not be given to the government to give to unproductive healthy people.  there is selfishness from the top down and the bottom up.  a lot of folks simply don't care, and Obama wants to give them more money and services than the government gives them now.

    2.  we live and do business in a global economy and working from the bottom up does not account for this.  the amount of job creation that we need cannot be created with obama's concept. 

    3.  if you give people $1k or so more in their pockets as obama's plan indicates, it will not be enough to be life changing so the impact has a minimal short-term effect.  we saw a perfect example of this last spring with the stimulus package.  it did not work.

    4.  some people tend to make the same mistakes over and over again, especially if they know they are going to be bailed out. (some companies are the same and this can be contolled.)   unless people choose to take personal responsibility for themselves and their families, it will not work.  Obama's economc plan does not encourage people to use their talents to help themselves.  

    this are just some of the reasons off the top of my head.
  • Haven't we tried this "trickle down" crap long enough guys?  I remember 1980.....didn't vote for Ron, but i said to myself....."Let's give this a chance, he may be right."
    Well i've waited....28 years, and it is astounding to see how much this once great nation has changed!
    Let's give this new guy a chance.....the tired old policies of the past are just not working for us!
  • JarrodM
    LMFAO,


    I've never liked the whole feeling of being obligated to tip anyway that is a good idea. Besides chances are that the waiter would not have reported that on his taxes anyway.
  • Titus Hunt
    Here is a creative approach to redistribution of wealth as offered in a local newspaper...

    Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read "Vote Obama, I need the money." I laughed.

    Once in the restaurant my server had on a "Obama 08" tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference--just imagine the coincidence.

    When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.

    I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.

    At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved money more.

    I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.
  • Titus Hunt
    JarrodM--
    Your comment #3 is correct.  Where does it say people are entitled to take from others and don't have to do for themselves?  instead of personal responsibility being a source of pride and government handouts/welfare being shameful as it should be, people think they are entitled.  Because of the liberal ideals, this is where we are now i guess!  many conservatives in the whitehouse are not acting like true conservatives and have also adopted liberal attitudes. 

    "People in  this country are some of the most giving of people, and are willing to help others, or at least they use to be. But people are getting sick and tired of being told that they have to give their money to the Government so it can take care of people who are not taking care of themselves."

    You are so right!
  • jcheney
  • JarrodM
    The problem is that the Government needs to get out of the business of trying to regulate everything. Look It is simple. Companies are out to make money, they make money by providing products that people want. Healthcare is a wanted commodity. It would not be nearlly as expensive as it is right now if people had the ability to pick and choose what services they wanted in their health care. But the government in each state has placed mandates that drive up the cost of health insurance.

    The bottom line is that Health Insurance is one of these things that falls under the catagory of happiness, and people have the right to persue it, but there is no RIGHT to it.

    For those that are not able to afford health care there are charrities that sometimes will step in. Of course these charities would have much mroe money if the Government was not already taking it all for there horrible Government programs.

    People in  this country are some of the most giving of people, and are willing to help others, or at least they use to be. But people are getting sick and tired of being told that they have to give their money to the Government so it can take care of people who are not taking care of themselves.

    Ever since the new contract the US has produced it's own society victoms, and needy. There was a time when people worked hard to provid for their family, and those that just could not make ends meet would turn to local charities that would help them out.

    Like all things it is not a perfect system, but to me it sure beets big government mandating to their citzens. It is like replacing a King with a great big King. Is that trully how we want to live, ruled by a system, that at a whime can mandaty the taking of our money and land for it's own purposes.
  • I find both candidates healthcare plans to be deeply flawed. McCain's would leave many unable to afford insurance and other would be uninsurable due to pre-existing conditions. Obama's boils down to a socialist policy. 

    Clicking through this website which clearly states candidates positions in their own words, without all of the b.s. to muddle through, i find that i like both candidates less and less.

    http://mypakragames.com/games/we-the-decided
  • Liem
    I like my money more than a stranger's health care. They can die or end up in lifelong debt for all I care. Only 15.8% don't have health insurance and that's good enough for me. Just because your mom or daughter gets sick and you can't pay for it is your own fault for being in a working class job.

    Like McCain says, health care is a privilege that some just aren't a lucky enough to enjoy.  Obama on the other hand, thinks that health care is a right. Healthy living for everyone is socialism.

    And Palin is a gift from heaven.
blog comments powered by Disqus