Degrees in Liberal Idiocy Now Available!

January 29th, 2007 LAConservative

For those liberals who want to educate themselves on the subjects of hate, anti-Christian, anti-traditional values; and want to perfect the art of protest and speaking without any intelligent thought, you can now get a graduate degree in Activism and Social Change. Of course, this lovely accredited college is located in the peaceful streets of San Francisco, and I heard that Cindy Sheehan will be the new Dean. Enjoy, Happy Learning and I’ll see you at the next ant-war protest.

Technorati Tags: liberal, liberalism, conservativecindy sheehan, sheehan, anti war protest
 


Rating: 2.1/5 (19 votes cast)

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please subscribe to my blog!

Enemy of the Week, Jane Fonda

January 29th, 2007 Urban Conservative

Well, she’s at it again. Hanoi Jane has strapped on her anti-war protest boots and is now opening her mouth about matters that she knows nothing about. What gets me irritated about the uninformed left is that they are so quick to pass judgment, protest this and that, and call for an impeachment; yet they have no plans or alternatives. Where was the outcry when Clinton was bombing Christians who were fighting Muslim terrorists in Kosovo? Oh, I guess this is different, right? In Kosovo, Christians were getting slaughtered and a Democrat was in office so that doesn’t count!

Technorati Tags: jane fonda, hanoi jane, anti war protest, liberals, liberalism


Rating: 2.8/5 (24 votes cast)

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please subscribe to my blog!

Enemy of the Week, Hugo Chavez

January 22nd, 2007 Urban Conservative

If you watch Hannity’s America on Sunday nights, you will know that he has a segment called “Enemy of the Week” and “Great American of the Week”; where he identifies two different people in the news and highlights the reasons why they made his weekly list. I decided tonight that I want to do something similar where I will identify just an Enemy of the Week; mainly because this will force me to write in my blog at least once a week. Plus, it’s easier for me to write about people I dislike than it is people I like and/or admire.

Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela is on the top of my list. Ever since he dissed President Bush and the U.S. a few months at the pitiful United Nations, I have had it out for this clown of a leader. Just a few days ago during his weekly radio and television broadcast, he told U.S. officials to “Go to hell!” for what he called unacceptable meddling in Venezuela’s affairs. He defended his administration’s effort to establish a socialist model and rejected U.S. concerns over a measure to grant him broad lawmaking powers, saying: “Go to hell, gringos! Go home!”

He also made some heinous comments insinuating that the US had something to do with the hanging of Saddam Hussein.

I have to agree with The Conservative Elitist comment that the US should reverse their policy of not assassinating foreign leaders; and start with Chavez, Ahmadinejad, Castro and then last but not least Kim Jong il. The fact of the matter is that all these men are dangerous; not only to the US, and to all free nations, but even to their own people. The world would be a much better place if these men were no longer breathing. 

Go ahead; call me a right-wing war monger. I’ve been called worse. If you think my belief system is that extreme, what are your thoughts on Chavez, Ahmadinejad, Castro and Kim Jong il? Are they peace loving, Nobel Prize winning pacifists?

Technorati Tags: hugo chavez, ahmadinejad, fidel castro, kim jong il, liberals, liberalism, sean hannity

 

 

 

 
 


Rating: 2.8/5 (25 votes cast)

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please subscribe to my blog!

Boxer and Rice Hash it out

January 14th, 2007 Urban Conservative

California Senator Barbara Boxer told Secretary of State Condi Rice during a testy Senate hearing on Thursday that without an immediate family Rice would pay no personal price for the Bush administration policies in Iraq. Boxer’s comments came during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in which Rice was questioned about President Bush’s new plans for the war in Iraq. Here is an excerpt on Boxer’s comments to Condi:

“Who pays the price?” Boxer asked Rice. “I’m not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old and my grandchild is too young. You’re not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with immediate family. “So who pays the price? The American military and their families.”

I guess my only comment is that the damn democrats have nothing better to do but find minor issues with those who support the war in Iraq; like not having any children. Since when does Barbara Boxer care about “who pays the price?” Who appointed her the spokesperson for the American people anyway? The fact of the matter is that the democrats have NO PLAN whatsoever about how to approach Iraq. If I remember correctly, a few months back, many big name democrats publicly said that we need more troops in Iraq; and now that Bush is pushing for more troops, they suddenly change their minds. Sounds to me like they are starting to flip flop again; a common attribute of the democratic party.

I personally think that Condi Rice is not only doing an excellent job as the Secretary of State; but I think she would make an even better President.

Technorati Tags: liberal, liberalism, conservativeiraq, barbara boxer, condi rice


Rating: 2.8/5 (16 votes cast)

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please subscribe to my blog!

Does Cindy Sheehan Have a Job?

January 4th, 2007 Urban Conservative

If there is one person on this earth (aside from a few people that post on this blog) that I can’t stand; it’s Cindy Sheehan. Today, when our lovely democrat majority tried to reveal their lobbying reform package, their press conference was bombarded by anti-war activists who want Congress to stop funding the Iraq war before taking on other issues. Sure Cindy, let’s stop the war, pull the troops out and let Iraq fall. I guess it’s okay for men, woman and children to die in Iraq as long as they aren’t Americans, right Cindy? Why not protest the genocide in Darfur or Somalia, or is that just not important to you? Thank God you weren’t alive and well during WWII or else we would all be speaking German right now.

Now, on to my point; it baffles me that she has so much damn time on her hands to protest the war in Iraq 24-7. Don’t get me wrong, she is an extremely talented protester and I admire her for that, but doesn’t she have anything better to do than to just march along the halls of congress or camp outside of Bush’s residence? Doesn’t she have bills to pay, pets to feed or plants to water? What about a hobby? Does she have one of those? And, yet she still has time to post all of her experiences on her blog. Doesn’t this woman have a job? Cindy Sheehan Sucks.

Technorati Tags: liberal, liberalism, conservativecindy sheehan, sheehan, anti war protest, Cindy Sheehan Sucks


Rating: 2.7/5 (19 votes cast)

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please subscribe to my blog!