Terrorism: Are we safer today than we were with Clinton?
“You, senator, I know, were the only person that I know of who suggested declaring war. In retrospect, you were probably right.” Source.
Those were the exact words of former secretary of state Madeleine Albright, during the 9/11 commission hearings, after being questioned by commissioner and former Sen. Bob Kerrey about the Clinton administration’s lackadaisical response to the terrorism against the U.S. that occurred from 1993 to 2000.
You see, back then if I remember correctly, Albright was talking tough like she was actually going to handle business and take on terrorism head on. So was her heroic boss, Clinton. However, if I remember right, it actually took Clinton some time to master the tough guy approach to terrorism. In the beginning, he was pretty soft, well…very soft. And, of course, he never really dealt with the problem.
For example, after the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993 Clinton urged us not to overreact, and, in an interview on MTV, described the bombing as the work of someone who “did something really stupid.” That’s not exactly tough talk. Source.
Terrorism continued.
Then he got bold. After the attack on the Khobar Towers barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, he said “The cowards who committed this murderous act must not go unpunished.” Source.
Terrorism continued.
He then got his rhetoric right (no pun intended) the time of the embassy attacks. “We will use all the means at our disposal to bring those responsible to justice, no matter what or how long it takes,” he said. “We are determined to get answers and justice.” Source.
Terrorism continued.
By October 2000, when al Qaeda bombed the USS Cole, Clinton had the routine down perfectly. “We will find out who was responsible and hold them accountable,” he said. Source.
Terrorism continued.
The fact of the matter is that Clinton is responsible for doing too little about terrorism during his eight years in office, in which there were several attacks against the U.S. Here is a quick recap of the terrorist attacks during his reign:
- 1993 World Trade Center bombing – killed six and injured 1,000.
- 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia – killed five soldiers.
- 1996 al-Khobar towers bombing in Saudi Arabia – killed 19 and injured 200 soldiers.
- 1998 bombing of US embassies in Africa – killed 257 and injured 5,000.
- 2000 bombing of the USS Cole – killed 17 and injured 3 sailors.
And the Bush Administration…
- 2001 World Trade Center bombing (all planned during the Clinton Administration) – killed 3,000 + innocent people.
And, what did Bush do? He is dealing with terrorism despite being scrutinized by the main stream media; and if that means occupying Iraq than so be it. While I am no Bush apologist and am very critical of some of his policies (immigration, border security), I can truly say with confidence that we are safer today than we were with Clinton.
And I still don’t understand why uninformed liberals actually believe that Bush caused 9/11 to happen; that his foreign policy while in office for 8 months caused this cowardly act.
Technorati Tags: liberal, liberalism, conservative, Â iraq, war on terror, clinton, clinton administration, bush, bush administration, world trade center, terrorism, are we safer today then we were when 9-11 occured


